Rajasthan assembly speaker CP Joshi moves to Supreme Court challenging High Court decision delivered on 24 th July 2020 in context to Sachin Pilot and 18 other MLA’s. He stated that this order is in violation with the previous judgement given by Supreme Court in 1992 in Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu case, as per which
ejusticeindia.com cordially invites you to register and participate in its online lectures on Alternative Dispute Resolution, dated 02 nd August 2020 (Sunday) at 11:00 AM (IST) onwards and 09th August 2020 11:00 AM onwards . All the participants who join the lectures will get an E-Certificate of Participation. The speakers of the lectures are following: 1. Adv.
The High Court of Delhi had rejected the petition seeking registration of migrant workers after the Central Government assured the Court to be in process to create database for the migrant workers. The bench headed by Justice Prathiba M. Singh refused the plea as the Central and the State Government made their submissions. The Government
Yesterday, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition filed that challenged the conduct of Common Law Admission Test (CLAT 2020) via the online mode. The bench comprising of Justice L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta and S Ravindra Bhat declined the plea with criticising the notification issued by the Consortium of National Law Universities dated 29th June
List of Chief Justices of India S. No Name Period of Office Bar HJ Kania 26 January 1950-6 November 1951 Bombay High Court Patanjali Sastri. M 7 November 1951- 3 January 1954 Madras High Court Mehr Chand Mahajan 4 January 1954- 22 December 1954 Punjab and Haryana High
CUSTODIAL TORTURES AND DEATH IN INDIA Author : Monalisha Singh Custodial death is very old concept which is prevalent in India since the British rule. Custodial death is an abrogation of human rights and a gross violation of human rights of the prisoners. This is completely against the law that prisoners are tortured physically in
Atmendra v State of Karnataka Case Summary Author : Ishita Arora Citation: (1998) 4 SCC 256 Bench: Justice M.K. Mukherjee and Justice Syed Shah Quadri. Introduction This case presents a glaring example of how a man getting enraged by trivial things has committed the most heinous crime of murder of the nearest relative. In this
Ammini and Ors. v State of Kerala Case Summary Author : Ishita Arora Citation: (1998) 2 SCC 301 Bench: Justice G.T. Nanavati and Justice M.J. Rao Introduction In the case of Ammini and Ors. v State of Kerala, an appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order of the conviction by the high
Today, Apex Court of India had expressed unhappiness when India Institute of Technology Bombay (IIT Bombay) had moved out from the smog tower project that combated for the Delhi pollution crisis. In December 2019, the Court had given the Centre and the Delhi Government three month for setting up ‘smog tower’ pilot project at Connaught
A trademark refers to a symbol, word or group of words that are legally registered and used to represent a company. Infringement of trademark implies using exact copy of a registered trademark, similar to registered trademark or using such trademark which may mislead buyers. Infringement of trademarks is a punishable offence. ITC moved to Bombay
