Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. Motorola Incorporated: Corporate Criminal Liability and the Doctrine of Attribution Author : Vanshika Panwar, 4th Year of 5 Year LL.B. Student, Quantum University , Roorkee Citation: (2011) 1 SCC 74; AIR 2011 SC 20 Bench: B. Sudershan Reddy and S.S. Nijjar, JJ. Introduction The Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. Motorola Incorporated (2011) judgment
Pyarali K. Tejani v. Mahadeo Ramchandra Dange: Food Adulteration, Strict Liability & Public Health Protection Author : Divyanshu Puri, 4th Year of 5 Year LL.B. Student, Quantum University , Roorkee Citation 1974 (1) SCC 167 Bench: V.R. Krishna Iyer and R.S. Sarkaria Introduction The case of Pyarali K. Tejani vs. Mahadeo Ramchandra Dange and Others
Author: Shubham Kumar, B.A. LL.B. Student, Department of Law, Quantum University, Roorkee Co-Author: Ms. Aditi Mishra, Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Quantum University, Roorkee CITATION: (2021) 5 SCC 283 Bench Anirudh Bose, Surya Kant, N.V Ramana Introduction One of the landmark case that the Supreme Court of India decided and that related to the bounce of cheques
Author: Aprajita Priyadarshni EQUIVALENT CITATIONS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 338 OF 1999 BENCH Mr. S. S. Shinde INTRODUCTION In the present the accused has been convicted by the Trial Court for offences under Sec 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code for falsely inducing a minor girl for marriage and taking her away from
Author: Ashish Saha (The ICFAI University, Dehradun Bench (Judges): Justice P.N. Bhagwati, Justice R.S. Pathak and Justice A.D. Koshal. (3 judge Bench also called Division Bench). Petitioner: Hussainara Khatoon & ors. Respondent: Home Secretary, State of Bihar. Citation: 1979 AIR 1369, 1979 SCR (3) 532. Background of the case: This case is the landmark case
EQUIVALENT CITATIONS: Appeal (crl.) 530-531 of 2003 BENCH: Mr. Justice Doraiswamy Raju, Justice Arijit Pasayat. INTRODUCTION: In Indian Penal code,1860 it has an chapter which covers the offence carried out by group of persons by assembling unlawfully in section 149. In order to convict someone on this section it’s necessary to prove common object not
Author: ANUSHA C GUDAGUR CITATION: 6 SCC 263 BENCH: Justice Arijit Payasat, Justice S.H. Kapadia INTRODUCTION: The case of Priya Patel vs. State of Madhya Pradesh stands as the landmark case for being the only case where the question of, whether a woman be prosecuted for gang rape has been taken up. It was an
Author: Nomaan Quasim (Aligarh Muslim University) INTRODUCTION Donoghue v. Stevenson is a very famous case related to tort of negligence. Every law student definitely heard about this case in his/her law school journey. This case set the foundation stone of the tort of negligence and also describes Lord Atkin’s famous “neighbour principle”, the common law
Author: Neha Singh Citation 2003 (10) SCC 521 Bench Justice Doraiswamy Raju, Justice Arijit Pasayat INTRODUCTION In this case the court explained the position of breach of trust by a public servant. Disposing of the property in violation of any legal contract accounts to breach of trust and is ingredient to the criminal breach of
Author: Ishita Arora Citation 1992 AIR 675, 1992 SCR (1) 466 Bench Justice Kuldip Singh and Justice R.M. Sahai. Introduction In the present case, a Special Leave Petition under Article – 136 of the Constitution of India was filed by the appellant against the order of conviction made by the High Court and Trial Court
