Citation: AIR (2010) 5 SCC 91 Bench: Justice B. Sudarshan Reddy, Justice Surinder Singh Najjar INTRODUCTION In this case the court held the significance of motive and scope of interference in Article 136 of Constitution of India. The appreciation of evidence and credibility of witnesses were weak and held that criminal justice should not be
Author : Neha Singh Citation: 2016 SC 708 Bench: Justice Dipak Mishra and Justice C. Nagappan INTRODUCTION In this case the court upheld the constitutional validity of the criminal defamation provisions in the Indian Penal Code, citing the Subramanian Swamy vs Union of India case and stress on the idea of fair criticism, dissent and
The High Court of Bombay held that RBI circulars issued on 27th March 2020 and 23rd May 2020 of moratorium is not applicable to mutual funds and debentures. The writ was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The writ by petitioner pleas that the respondent is “the state” as per Article 12 of
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Wednesday (July 15) has made it clear that anticipatory bail to an accused must be granted under very exceptional circumstances as “a person couched in comparative safety of the pre-arrest bail would certainly not disclose all the facts within his knowledge.” The purpose of anticipatory bail is to
The High Court of Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction dismissed the plea for considering legal service as an essential service under the Maharashtra Essential Services Maintenance Act,2017. The order was passed on 10th July 2020 by the bench comprising Justice S.S. Shinde and Justice Madhav Jamdar. The petitioner Imran Mohd. Salar Shaikh pleaded that the court
The central government had introduced major agricultural market reforms through three ordinances: – The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Ordinance 2020, The Farming Produce Trade and Commence (Promotion and Facilitation) Ordinance 2020. The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Ordinance 2020. Items of Entry 14 in the state list of List II
Citation: AIR 2012 (2) SCC 728 Bench: Justice A.K Patnaik, Justice Swantanter Kumar INTRODUCTION In this case the court held that the murder was extremely brutal and one of the rarest of the rare case. The appellant’s wife ran away and he accused his mother as the reason and murdered her. The court decided upon
Author : Neha Singh Citation: AIR 1977 Mad 182, (1977) 1 MLJ 482 Bench: Justice Ramanujam INTRODUCTION This case is a face off of provisions of legitimacy of a child in Muslim Personal law and section 112 of Indian Evidence Act. In this case it was held that the Evidence Act is a very general
Author : Prity Kumari Citations- (2012)2 SCC 648 Bench- SB Singh, Harjit Singh Bedi Introduction- It was seen that in earlier cases of drunken driving resulting in an accident were being determined in accordance with sections 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Under these sections, there are provisions with warrant maximum punishments
Jammu and Kashmir High Court Bar Association President Mian Abdual Qayoom was is about to complete his detention period on 7th August,2020. The Supreme Court today has asked the government of Jammu and Kashmir if the detention was required as the expiry of the same is near. The petition challenged to prevent detention of Qayoom
