1st E-Lok Adalat amid Covid-19: JK Legal Services Authority When whole citizenry counting the prosecutors are in profound mental stretch due to sick impacts of Covid-19 widespread, J&K State Legitimate Administrations Specialist, beneath the direction of its Patron-in-Chief, Ms. Justice Gita Mittal, Chief Equity, High Court of J&K and beneath informational of Justice Rajesh Bindal,
Extends Interim orders till October 31st: Delhi HC In continuation of its prior orders, all intervals orders passed by the Delhi High Court and its subordinate courts, which are subsisting as of nowadays, stand expanded till October 31, 2020 (Court on its possess movement vs State: Re Expansion of between times orders). The High court
CAN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT BE JUSTIFIED? INTRODUCTION: “Punishment is justice for the unjust” Since time immemorial, death penalty has been used to punish the most heinous crimes in existence. Also known as capital punishment, it has been observed as an institutionalized practice introduced for the purpose of deliberately executing persons, following actual or supposed misconduct from
Attorney General KK Venugopal denied his consent to file a criminal case of contempt of court against Bollywood actress Swara Bhaskar The Bollywood actress Swara Bhaskar is accused of making derogatory and conspiratorial statements against the Supreme Court verdict on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute case in Ayodhya . Keep in mind that to initiate
Case Name : Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Raj Narain Author : Ishita Arora Citation: 1975 AIR 2299, 1976 (2) SCR 347, 1975 Suppl. SCC 1 Bench: ChiefJusticeA.N. Ray, Justice H.R. Khanna, Justice K.K. Mathew, Justice M.H. Beg, Justice Y.V. Chandrachud. Introduction The present case is a landmark case for the following reasons; It was the
Common cause vs Union of India Author : Ishita Arora Citation: (2018) 5 SCC Bench: Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, Justice A. Bhushan, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice A.SIkri. Introduction The present case Common cause vs Union of India is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court recognized and gave
Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs Union of India Author : Ishita Arora Citation: 2011 (4) SCC 454 Bench: Justice Markandey Katju and Justice Gyan Sudha Misra. Introduction ‘Right to life’ is a guaranteed fundamental right under the constitution of India. However, there has been a lot of debate in the country whether right to life includes
WEBIMPACT’S WEBINAR ON “COURT CONDUCT AND CONTEMPT” : REGISTER NOW!!! ABOUT WEBIMPACT is an initiave by JLSR, JUS COMMUNE AND LAW COLUMN. It was started to educate law students through webinars. WEBINAR DETAILS : TOPIC : Court, Conduct and Contempt SPEAKER : Jayant Bhatt, Advocate, Supreme Court of India DATE : 26TH August, 2020 TIMINGS
SC: Plea to Extend Moratorium A petition filed by Advocate Vishal Tiwari is plea seeking that all banks extend the moratorium period till 31st December 2020, the plea highlights the financial difficulties faced by lawyers, those engaged in the service sector and the travel and tourism sector. The plea seeks extend the moratorium of the
