Case Name : National Legal Services Authority Act (NALSA) v/s Union of India and Others Author : Varnika Verma CITATIONS AIR 2014 SC 1863 MANU/SC/0309/2014 2014 (5) SCALE 438 2014 (4) SCJ 148 JT 2014 (5) SC 182 2014 (7) Bom CR 1 BENCH Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan, Justice A.K.Sikri. INTRODUCTION The case is concerned to
CASE NAME : SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES ON RECORD ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA AUTHOR : VARNIKA VERMA CITATIONS AIR 1994 SC 268 MANU/SC/0073/1994 1993 (5) SLR 337 (SC) [1993] SUPP 2 SCR 659 (1993) 4 SCC 441 BENCH Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar, Justice Chelameswar, Justice Madan B. Lokur, Justice Kurian Joseph, Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel.
CASE NAME : EMMANUEL VS STATE OF KERALA AUTHOR : VARNIKA VERMA CITATIONS AIR 1987 SC 748 1986 Cri LJ 1736 MANU/SC/0061/1986 1986 (2) SCALE 217 (1986) 3 SC 615 [1986] 3 SCR 518 BENCH Justice Reddy O. Chinappa INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India noticed that the school children were dismissed for not singing
Author : Kriti Gandhi Copyright is a exclusive right of the Copyright Owner. Where the right to copy or reproduce a work the author acquires copyright. It is a product of human ability and mental capacity to do something creative. Includes writing, play, music and other creative activities. Copyright often creates Right to Rem and
Author : Tanvi Gupta Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea is a Latin maxim meaning an accused cannot be held guilty without criminal intent. Generally, any act has two intents physical and mental intent i.e. actus rius and mens rea. An act of the accused combined with an intention to specific criminal wrong proves
Author : Tanvi Gupta Actus nemini facit injurium is a Latin maxim meaning the act of law does injury to no one. This maxim states that bringing a law suit by plaintiff against other party causes no harm to second party. Application of law is based on this principle that if any person act beyond
Author : Ishita Arora Citation AIR 1986 SC 180 Bench Chief Justice Y.V. Chandrachud, Justice A. Vardarajan, Justice O.C. Reddy, Justice S.M. Fazalali and Justice V.D. Tulzapurkar. Introduction The present case is one of those cases which broaden the horizons of the meaning of fundamental rights. In this case, right to livelihood was held to
Author : Ishita Arora Citation 2017 (2) SCJ 136 Bench Chief Justice T.S. Thakur, Justice Madan B. Lokur, Justice S.A. Bobde, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice A.K. Goel, Justice U.U. Lalit, Justice L. Nageshwar Rao Introduction Article – 123 and 213 of the Constitution deals with ordinance making power. Article 123 states that the President can
