Author : Ishita Arora Citation AIR 1986 SC 180 Bench Chief Justice Y.V. Chandrachud, Justice A. Vardarajan, Justice O.C. Reddy, Justice S.M. Fazalali and Justice V.D. Tulzapurkar. Introduction The present case is one of those cases which broaden the horizons of the meaning of fundamental rights. In this case, right to livelihood was held to
CASE NAME : UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION VS UNION OF INDIA Author : VAIBHAVI BATRA EQUIVALENT CITATION (1991) 4 SCC 584 BENCH Justice R.S. Pathak, Justice R. Mishra, Justice E.S. Venkataramiah, Justice N.D. Ojha and Justice M.N. Venkatachalliah INTRODUCTION In the year 1934 American Industrial Giant Union Carbide with the Union of India incorporated Union Carbide
Case Name : NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR VS UNION OF INDIA Author : Vaibhavi Batra EQUIVALENT CITATION (2018) 10 SCC 1 BENCH CJI Dipak Misra, Justice R.F. Nariman, Justice Indu Malhotra, Justice A.M. Khanwilker and Justice D.Y. Chandrachaud INTRODUCTION Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) is a provision that criminalises homosexuality. Homosexuality means,
Case Name : INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION VS STATE OF KERELA Author : Vaibhavi Batra EQUIVALENT CITATION Writ Petition No. 373 of 2006 BENCH CJI Dipak Misra, Justice R.F. Nariman, Justice Indu Malhotra, Justice R.M. Khanwilker and Justice D.Y. Chandrachaud INTRODUCTION Sabarimala Temple is one of the oldest temples of India and is one of
Case Name : Emperor vs Mushnooru Suryanarayana Murthy Author : Aprajita Priyadarshini EQUIVALENT CITATIONS (1912) 22 MLJ 333 BENCH Justice Benson INTRODUCTION The Indian Penal Code very finely defines the differences between murder, culpable homicide and culpable homicides amounting or not amounting to murder under its provisions. To commit an offence under any of these
CASE : K S PUTTASWAMY VS UNION OF INDIA Author : Vaibhavi Batra EQUIVALENT CITATION (2017) 10 SCC 1 BENCH Justice J.S. Khehar, Justice S. K. Kaul, Justice D Y. Chandrachaud, Justice R. F. Nariman, Justice S.A. Bobde, Justice S.A. Nazeer, Justice R.K. Agrawal, Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice A. M. Sapre. INTRODUCTION The Adhaar
Common cause vs Union of India Author : Ishita Arora Citation: (2018) 5 SCC Bench: Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, Justice A. Bhushan, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice A.SIkri. Introduction The present case Common cause vs Union of India is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court recognized and gave
Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs Union of India Author : Ishita Arora Citation: 2011 (4) SCC 454 Bench: Justice Markandey Katju and Justice Gyan Sudha Misra. Introduction ‘Right to life’ is a guaranteed fundamental right under the constitution of India. However, there has been a lot of debate in the country whether right to life includes
Sardar Bhagat Singh vs Lachman Singh Akali Author : Shruti Kumari CITATIONS: AIR 1968 Cal 296, 1968 CriLJ 759. BENCH: Justice T. Mukherji INTRODUCTION: This case is at the stage of appeal in the hon’ble Calcutta High Court with the special leave of the court under Section 417 against the helding of the learned magistrate
