Author : Neha Singh Citation: AIR 1977 Mad 182, (1977) 1 MLJ 482 Bench: Justice Ramanujam INTRODUCTION This case is a face off of provisions of legitimacy of a child in Muslim Personal law and section 112 of Indian Evidence Act. In this case it was held that the Evidence Act is a very general
Author : Prity Kumari Citations- (2012)2 SCC 648 Bench- SB Singh, Harjit Singh Bedi Introduction- It was seen that in earlier cases of drunken driving resulting in an accident were being determined in accordance with sections 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Under these sections, there are provisions with warrant maximum punishments
Jammu and Kashmir High Court Bar Association President Mian Abdual Qayoom was is about to complete his detention period on 7th August,2020. The Supreme Court today has asked the government of Jammu and Kashmir if the detention was required as the expiry of the same is near. The petition challenged to prevent detention of Qayoom
The Supreme Court today (July 15) said that it will hear on a day-to-day basis petitions challenging the constitutional validity of a Maratha reservation in education and jobs by the Maharashtra government. The hearings start on July 27. The bench, comprising Justices L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta and S Ravindra Bhatt, has directed all parties
About the Course As we all know that knowledge of IPR is very much important in current scenario. Through this course our aim is to provide an introduction and general overview of the IPR and related law. The course is entirely self-study and includes test questions to measure your understanding and progress in learning the
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday (July 14) directed the central government to submit its response in a sealed envelope mentioning the policy under which Indian Army personnel were asked to delete their social media accounts. The division bench, presided by Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Justice Asha Menon was hearing a petition filed by
On 10th July (Judgment copy made available on 14th July) Supreme court passed the order for the first time it will enable service of notice, summons and exchange of pleadings or documents via Email, Fax, commonly used instant message application (WhatsApp and Telegram) after considering the issue as to visit post offices and physical exchange
INDIRA GANDHI VS RAJ NARAIN Forty five years ago, on 25th June 1975, India saw its darkest phase in the history of independent India. Indira Gandhi proclaimed national emergency under Article 356 which lasted for 21 months. Two weeks earlier, Allahabad High Court had set aside the election of PM Indira Gandhi in the case
E-justice India cordially invite you to the webinar on “Human Rights and Mob Lynching with emphasis to Palghar issue“ Speaker – Sh. Shashank Sekhar JhaAdvocate, Supreme Court of India Date: July 18, 2020 Timing: 11:00 AM Onwards CLICK HERE TO REGISTER After registering, First 200 registered Candidates will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.
About the Law Firm Venexa Legal is a full-service law firm, with a PAN India presence, providing innovative legal solutions to its domestic as well as international clients. The firm offers a large portfolio of legal services. We are headquartered at New Delhi with branch offices in Mumbai and Lucknow and Prayagraj. Venexa Legal has
