Citation AIR 1978 Delhi 296, 14 (1978) DLT 18 b, 1978 RLR 525 Introduction It is a case of Restitution of Conjugal Rights which fall under the section 9 of HMA 1955. The wife was working as a headmistress in government school in Punjab. At the time of her marriage, she had been working for
The Supreme Court has held that the High Court cannot convert itself into a court of appeal, while hearing a petition under Article 227 of the Indian Constitution. In a recent case of Md. Inam v Sanjay Kumar Singhal, A division Bench of Justices Navin Sinha and BR Gavai observed that the exercise of jurisdiction
The Madhurai bench of Madras High Court took a suo moto cognizance against the 3 policemen who were held responsible for the custodial deaths of Jeyaraj and his son Bennix. Those police officers were accused of obstructing the proceedings conducted by the magistrate. The said police officials are ordered to be presented before the court
ABOUT THE ORGANISATION Vishvanath Sharan Foundation (VSF) is a Trust established in 2016, registered under S. 12AA of the Income tax Act, 1961 and recognized by NITI Aayog. The foundation seeks to work towards developmental change in the field of sports policy across the country. ABOUT THE INTERNSHIP 1. VSF is looking for undergraduate law
The Ministry of Information Technology, invoking it’s power under section 69A of the Information Technology Act read with the relevant provisions of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking of Access of Information by Public) Rules 2009 has decided to block 59 apps ( see Appendix) since in view of information available they are
CITATION- AIR 1966 SC 43 BENCH- K. SUBBARAO, J.C. SHAH, R.S. BACHAWAT JJ. FACTS INVOLVED – Appellant was dealer in food grains at Dhar in Madhya Pradesh. He was prosecuted in the court of ADM, Dhar for having stock of 885 Maunds & 21/4 seers of wheat for sale without a proper licence for the
Vishaka & Others vs State of Rajasthan Bench of Judges CJI, SUJATA V. MANIHAR, B.N.KIRPAL Case brief This case is related to the evil of sexual harassment of women at working place. This case is the landmark case in the history of the sexual harassment that is decided by the Supreme Court. Sexual harassment means
CITATION- AIR 1994 SC 1918 DECIDED ON- 11.03.1994 BENCH- S.R. Pandian, A.M. Ahmadi, Kuldip Singh, J.S. Verma, P.B. Sawant, K. Ramaswamy, S.C. Agrawal, Yogeshwar Dayal and B.P. Jeevan Reddy, JJ. CASE INTRODUCTION-This case is considered to be a landmark judgement in the history of India. Till the judgement of the case As per the provision of Article 356
The Karnataka High Court asked the state government to immediately consider allowing conduct of online classes for primary school students, till a committee submits a report on the issue. The Court made the suggestion while dealing with the batch of petitions challenging the move to ban online classes for students from class LKG to class
The Delhi High Court has notified “Samadhan On-Line Mediation Project” at its Mediation & Conciliation Centre in an attempt to hold virtual sessions for dispute resolution amid COVID-19 pandemic. At present, the total pendency at the Centre is 846 which includes 670 Court Referred Mediation Matters and 172 Pre-Litigation Matter. 4 are Pre-Institution Mediation matters.
