By Siddharth Anand The Supreme Court of India recently delivered the judgment in a batch of special leave petitions. The petitions were filed by Franklin Templeton against a judgment of the Karnataka High Court. In the year 2020, Karnataka High Court restrained Franklin Templeton Investments (FT) from proceeding with the winding up of debt fund
The Supreme Court has strongly objected to the lawyer asking for a date in the case. The court has said that the right answer for seeking dates from the lawyers is live streaming of the court so that people will know who is taking time and why the dates are being taken in the case.
(Bar Council of Delhi) has temporarily suspended the license of a lawyer. The lawyer is alleged to have submitted his fake Covid-19 report to get financial assistance from the Bar Council. The Bar Council of Delhi found that it falls under the category of malpractice, forgery and fraud. Stating that the laboratory has confirmed that
The Delhi High Court Fri day dismissed a plea on be half of student-activist Gul fisha Fatima, claiming her detention in a Delhi riots case to be illegal, saying it was “completely mis placed” and “not maintainable”. A Bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh said the writ of habeas cor pus would not
Bench of Justice JR Midha observed thus: “Community dogs (stray/street dogs) have the right to food and citizens have the right to feed community dogs but in exercising this right, care and caution should be taken to ensure that it does not impinge upon the rights of others or cause any harm, hindrance, harassment and
The draft of the Lawyers’ Safety and Security Bill has now been made public by the ‘Bar Council of India’ for the opinion of all the stakeholders. Opinions, suggestions and feedback can be given on this till July 9. Legal measures are being taken in the country to protect from attacks on lawyers. A law
The Bombay High Court on Thursday confirmed the 2002 trial court verdict acquitting TIPS co-founder Ramesh Taurani, and convicting Abdul Rauf Merchant in the 1997 murder of T-series owner Gulshan Kumar. The brothers were found guilty of murder (302), common intention (34) of IPC and under 27 of the Arms Act. The court additionally found
Judgement: 16/062021 Criminal Petition 3865/2021 A petition is filed by the petitioner-accused under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., case titled SHASHIBHUSHNA K V STATE OF KARNATKA for granting anticipatory bail in the offences punishable under Sections 354(A), 354(D), 506, 504, 120B, 376, 420 of IPC and Section 67A of Information Technology Act. The court pronounced that,
The Karnataka High Court on 13 May 2021, Thursday observed that not giving second dose of COVID-19 vaccine will be a violation of fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. A division bench of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Aravind Kumar also told the State government to tell the truth to
Author: Anagha K Saurabh Sharma, a Delhi-based lawyer, moved to High Court in September, demanding a refund of the Rs 500 fine which was imposed on him under the Delhi Epidemic Diseases (Management of COVID-19) Regulations, 2020 according to which authorized Persons to have the right to enforce a fine of Rs 500 for the
