STATEMENT OF FACTS:• On January 1, 1979, the govt headed by the PM Sri Morarji Desai designated the second Backward Classes commission u/a 340 of the Constitution to research the SEBCs inside the region of India and prescribe ventures to be taken for their progressions.• The commission presents its report in December 1980 and recognized
INTRODUCTION The present case is one of the historic cases which deal with the wide parameters of Capital Punishment in India. There is no denying the fact that it was in this very case where the convict was the first of all to be hanged and lawfully executed in India for a crime as rape
CASE NAME: K M Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra CITATION- AIR 1962 SC 605 DECIDED ON- 24th November, 1961 BENCH- K. Subbarao, SK Das, Raghubar Dayal INTRODUCTION- A landmark case in the criminal history of India, K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra has been a case discussed like ever since now. This judgment made its place as soon as
CITATION- AIR 1978 SC 597 BENCH- M.H. BEG (CJI), Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, V.R. KRISHNA IYER, P.N. BHAGWATI, N.L. UNTWALIA, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI & P.S. KAILASAM JJS. FACTS- Maneka Gandhi was a journalist. Her passport was confiscated by Regional Passport Officer, New Delhi on 2nd July 1977. Ministry of External Affairs declined to provide any reason
INTRODUCTION The case was afresh case for the Indian Judiciary that dealt with the ample of laws left behind the British Empire and did not concede with the spirit of the Indian Constitution. It was on the basis of this judgement that the Doctrine of Eclipse came into the view. FACTS OF THE CASE The
Case Name- Danial Latifi vs Union of India CITATION- AIR 2001 SC 3958 DECIDED ON- 28th Sept. 2001 BENCH- G.B. Pattanaik, S. Rajendra Babu, D.P. Mohapatra, Doraiswamy Raju, Shivraj V. Patil CASE INTRODUCTION- The one of counsel of Shah Bano’s, Danial Latifi Challenged the above act on the basis of its constitutional validity as violation of article 14
DECIDED ON- 12 March 2004/ February 2012 BENCH- Hon’ble Judge Doraiswamy Raju and Arjit Pasayat. Laws & Acts Applied in the case were – Section 195 A IPC, Section 15 of the Contempt of Court, Act, 1991, Article 129 of the constitution, Article 142(2) of the constitution,1949. CASE INTRODUCTION- This Case is Considered as one of the
