Karnataka High Court has directed to the State Government for considering to take a decision by 19th August for seeking a loan up to Rs 5 lakh extended to members of the bar are in financial stress due to Covid-19, on a representation made by the Belgavi Bar Association. The division bench of Chief Justice
The plea has been filed by Advocate Reepak Kansal stating that till date no major law has been formed that regulates online broadcasting channels, claiming themselves to be press. He said that these electronic media channels need to be regulated and stopped from hampering respect of any individual. Further he referred to Article 19 of
In order to avoid this inconvenience due to complete shutdown in containment areas Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court suggests Aurangabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) to facilitate easier access to citizens during this fourth phase of nationwide lockdown enforced to curb corona virus . Division Bench of Justice PB Varale and Justice S Kulkarni at
The court while dispensing its order based on a petition opined that living in a conjunction of relationship for a prolonged period is considered as a live-in relationship, nevertheless such kind of a relationship for 2 days would even be regarded as a live in relationship. The petitioner while instating the petition claimed that he
The present issue was brought to the court’s notice by a letter addressed by the President of the Delhi High Court Bar Association on May 02.This decision was taken by an order dated May 14 by the Committee constituted to prepare the Graded Action Plan for normal functioning of the court. To access the chambers,
On 9th May 2020, the SC dismissed a Petition seeking for directions for use of the term “Physical distancing” instead of “Social distancing” and imposed Costs of RS. 10,000/-. The Plea, filed by Advocate-On-Record Satya Mitra on behalf of Shakeel Qureshi, and argued by senior Advocate S.B Deshmukh, he is in support of Plea that
