Tag: Legal Update

Imprisonment Up to 6 Months or Fine? SC to Decide Prashant Bhushan’s Punishment in Contempt Case Today

Imprisonment Up to 6 Months or Fine? SC to Decide Prashant Bhushan’s Punishment in Contempt Case Today The Supreme Court is planned to articulate on Monday its decision on the quantum of sentence to be granted to activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan, sentenced for disdain of court over his two tweets against the judiciary. A bench headed

PIL FILED IN SC FOR FORMATION OF BROADCAST REGULATORY AUTHORITY THAT WILL REGULATE ELECTRONIC MEDIA

The plea has been filed by Advocate Reepak Kansal stating that till date no major law has been formed that regulates online broadcasting channels, claiming themselves to be press. He said that these electronic media channels need to be regulated and stopped from hampering respect of any individual. Further he referred to Article 19 of

High Court of Madras give relief to Advocates to apply as the President Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

Yesterday, the Madras High Court passed an order which allowed Advocates to also apply for the post of President Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The order was passed in reply to notification dated 23rd June which called for applications issued by the Union Finance Ministry.   The interim relief order was passed as it was

Separation of power between the UGC and the Bombay HC.

The University Grants Commission filed an affidavit for replying to the plea which challenges its issue that has directives for mandate examinations for the final year students till September 2020. The UGC has told the High Court of Bombay that Maharashtra Government’s Resolution to allow Universities and Colleges to graduate its final year students without

PUBLICISE WHATSAPP DETAILS OF SHOPKEEPERS & 24 HR HELPLINE TO FACILITATE CITIZEN IN NEED : SUGGESTS BOMBAY HC

In order to avoid this inconvenience due to complete shutdown in containment areas   Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court suggests Aurangabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) to facilitate easier access to citizens during this fourth phase of nationwide lockdown enforced to  curb corona virus . Division Bench of Justice PB Varale and Justice S Kulkarni at

Live in relationship between a boy and girl either for 2 days would be considered under the same head, Punjab and Haryana HC:-

The court while dispensing its order based on a petition opined that living in a conjunction of relationship for a prolonged period is considered as a live-in relationship, nevertheless such kind of a relationship for 2 days would even be regarded as a live in relationship. The petitioner while instating the petition claimed that he