CASE NAME : SWAPNIL TRIPATHI VS SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AUTHOR : VAIBHAVI BATRA EQUIVALENT CITATION (2018) 10 SCC 628 BENCH CJI Dipak Misra, Justice A.M. Khanwilker and Justice D.Y. Chandrachaud INTRODUCTION In theory, it has always been asserted that every citizen in India can attend the proceedings of the Court. But, in reality things
CASE NAME : SHEELA BARSE VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Author : Vaibhavi Batra EQUIVALENT CITATION 1983 SC 378 BENCH Justice Rangnath Misra, Justice P.N. Bhagwati, Justice Amrendra Nath, Justice R.S. Sen and Justice M.M. Dutt INTRODUCTION Indian Constitution grants equal rights to women, prisoners’ rights and arrested person’s rights under Article 14, 15(3), 21, 22.
Case Name : NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (NALSA) VS. UNION OF INDIA Author : Srishti Introduction The lives of human beings are full of intricacies, but LGBT face much more ordeal compared to other people. In today’s times, what is necessary is to comprehend the feelings of the LGBT community and also to grant them
Case Name : Dhulabhai v. State of M.P., AIR 1969 SC 78. Author : Pallabi Paul CITATION AIR 1996 P&H 107. BENCH HIDAYATULLAH,M. (CJ),BACHAWAT, R.S.VAIDYIALINGAM,C.A ,HEGDE,K.S. ,GROVER, A.N. INTRODUCTION This case was all about the case where the appellants were Tobacco dealers and we’re having these business in Ujjain ,a dispute took place with regards
Case Name : Devilal Modi v. STO, AIR 1965 SC 1150. Author : Pallabi Paul CITATION AIR 1996 P&H 107. BENCH Gajendragadkar, P.B. (Cj), Wanchoo, K.N., Hidayatullah, M., Dayal, Raghubar, Mudholkar, J.R INTRODUCTION A Challenged the validity of the assessment order provided for in Article 226. The petition had been rejected on merits. Also the
Case Name : Daryao v. State of U.P., AIR 1961 SC 1457 Author : Pallabi Paul CITATION AIR 1961 SC 1457 BENCH Gajendragadkar, P.B., Sarkar, A.K., Wanchoo, K.N., Gupta, K.C. Das, Ayyangar, N. Rajagopala INTRODUCTION In the case of Daryao & Others v. State of UP & Others, the Apex Court has placed the doctrine
Author : M Sameer Case Name : QUEEN EMPRESS V KHANDU VALAD EQUIVALENT CITATIONS: 1891 ILR BOM 194 BENCH: Mr.Justice Charles Sargent, Mr.Justice Birdwood, Mr.Justice Parsons. INTRODUCTION: In criminal law Actus reus and mens rea are the essential elements which constitutes crime, it’s prosecutor duty to make a case without a reasonable doubt. Even a
CASE NAME : UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION VS UNION OF INDIA Author : VAIBHAVI BATRA EQUIVALENT CITATION (1991) 4 SCC 584 BENCH Justice R.S. Pathak, Justice R. Mishra, Justice E.S. Venkataramiah, Justice N.D. Ojha and Justice M.N. Venkatachalliah INTRODUCTION In the year 1934 American Industrial Giant Union Carbide with the Union of India incorporated Union Carbide
Case Name : PUDR v. Union of India Author : Srishti Introduction In this landmark judgement, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, considered the scope and ambit of Article 23 in detail. The Hon’ble Court stated that the scope of Article 23 is wide and unlimited and strikes at “traffic in human beings” and “beggar”
Case Name : Kanhaiya Kumar vs State of NCT Delhi Author : Khushboo Chopra Introduction Kanhaiya Kumar, the then student of Jawahar Lal Nehru university student’s union president was charged in sedition case lodged in the year 2016 by the Delhi police. Sedition is a non bailable offence due to which Kanhaiya was in the
