Author: Dhananjay Bhattacharya 1. Introduction The Case is Landmark Judgement, and is one of the first cases where the question about Privacy was considered upon by the Supreme Court. The Petitioner Kharak Singh had challenged in the Supreme Court of India the Constitutional Validity of the Chapter 22 of the UP police Regulations. This challenge
Author: Aadarsh Mishra (The ICFAI University, Dehradun) Smt. Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India & Anr. 1985 AIR 1618 Cr LJ 1302 1985 SCR Supl. (1) 741 Writ Petition No. 845 of 1980 Hon’ble Judges/ Coram: Y.V. Chandrachud, R.S. Pathak, Amarendra Nath Sen. Jurisdiction: Original Jurisdiction u/a 32 of The Constitution of India. Acts/ Sectionsinvolved:
Author: Cherie Dharmani Equivalent Citation 17th December,1998. Bench Mr. G. B. Pattabaik and M . B. Shah. Introduction This case of Bharat Singh Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh, on 17th December, 1998 is an appeal case against the Judgement given on 30th January, 1997 by the Allahabad High Court that arose out of the Sessions
Author: Khushboo Chopra (Khalsa College of Law) CITATION (1977) 2 SCC 806: AIR 1977 SC 1680 BENCH HON’BLE JUSTICE P.N. SHINGHAL INTRODUCTION The Appeal deals with the sub-set of the principle of Res Judicata that is Constructive res judicata mentioned in the explanation IV and V of the section 11 of the civil procedure code.
Author: Ishita Arora Case Name: Bhagwan Singh v. The State of Haryana Citation: 1976 AIR 202, 1976 SCR (2) 921 Bench: Justice P.K. Goswami, Justice P.N. Bhagwati and Justice N.L. Untwalia. Introduction In the present case, a special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India by the appellant against the order of
Author: Ishita Arora Case Name: Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT of Delhi) Citation: (2011) 6 SCC 396. Bench: Justice Markandey Katju and Justice Gyan Sudha Misra. Introduction The present case is of honor killing. The Supreme Court in this case held that honor killings due to any reason come under the category of rarest of
Author: Pratibha Rakesh Singh Citation: 2010 (7) SCC 398 Facts In the above given case, the facts are such that, Maharashtra Government in the book “Shivaji – Hindu King in Islamic India” which was written by Prof. James W. Laine had some derogatory, slanderous and defamatory statements against Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj which resulted in disharmony
Author: Mayank Raj Case Name: P. Rathinam vs. Union of India Citation 1994 AIR 1844, 1994 SCC (3) 394. Bench B.L.Hansaria and P.M.Sahai. Introduction In the case of P.Rathinam vs. UOI the petition were filed in the court for the constitutional validity of Section 309 of IPC it states that whoever attempts to commit suicide
Author: Mayank Raj Case name: Chacko vs. State Of Kerala Citation AIR 2003 SC 265 Bench N.Santosh Hegde and B.P.Singh. Introduction The denounced is not referenced itself discourages the previous passing on presentation which has named the charged on 28.7.1996 itself. Learned advice likewise brought up that however the primary data report was recorded on
Author: Mayank Raj Case Name: Charan Lal Sahu vs. Giani Zail Singh Citation 1984 AIR 309, 1984 SCR (2) 6. Bench Y.V. CHANDRACHUD (CJ), P.N.BHAGWATI, AMARENDRA NATH SEN, D.P.MADON, M.P.THAKKAR. Introduction The case Charan Lal Sahu vs. Giani Zail Singh is that the election would be held for the President of India nominations were filed
