Author: Ishita Arora Citation (2015) 4 SCC 452 (SC) Bench Justice M.Y. Eqbal and Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose. Introduction In the present case, a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Indian Constitution was filed by the appellant against the order of High Court which upheld the sentence awarded by the Trial Court. In
Author – J Shruthi A) CITATION: AIR 1985 Supp SCC 432 B) BENCH: Justice O.C.Reddy Justice Eradi V.Balakrishna Justice V.Khalid C) INTRODUCTION: The age of superannuation to the employees in the State of Andhra Pradesh is 55 years to begin, but during the year of 1978, the government raised the age to 58. Later at
Author: Shuruthi J (SASTRA Deemed University, School of Law) A) CITATION: AIR 1964 SC 1013 B) BENCH: Hon’ble CJ B.P. Sinha . Hon’ble Justice P.B. Gajendragadkar, Hon’ble Justice K.N. Wanchoo, Hon’ble Justice K.C.D. Gupta, J.C. C) INTRODUCTION: The appellants are the companies that hold mining licenses for extraction of coal in the district of Chhindwara.
Author(s)- 1. Gayatri Singh (UPES Dehradun) 2. Hardik Manoj Manwani ABSTRACT The Honourable Supreme Court’s historic ruling, which took into account the social and economic ethos of our nation, is noteworthy. The concept of “industry” as stated in Section 2(j)[1] of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 was thoroughly researched by the Honorable Supreme Court. The
Author: Khushboo Chopra CITATION AIR 1961 SC 1720 BENCH SUBBARAO, K. INTRODUCTION The case questioned the maintainability of the suit filed by Aradanaikar and trustee of the temple for the declaration of the right to first Theertham. FACTS In Tirunelveli district there is a temple at Alwar Tirunelveli called Athinathalwar temple. The deity presiding in
Author: Khushboo Chopra CITATION 1994 SCC (2) 14 BENCH JUSTICE K. RAMASWAMY INTRODUCTION The case deals with the explanation VIII of the section 11 of civil procedure code which states that an issue heard and finally decided by the court of limited jurisdiction , competent to decide such issue , shall operates as res judicata
Author: Mayank Raj Case – Bhikari vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh. Citation – 1966 AIR, 1 1965 SCR (3) 194. Bench – J.R.Mudholkar, K.N.Wanchoo, S.M.Sikri. Introduction – The appealing party who murdered a youngster in a merciless way and harmed others was attempted and sentenced under section 302 IPC and his intrigue under the steady
Author: Mayank Raj Case – Bir Singh and Ors. Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh. Citation – AIR 1978 SC 59, 1978 CriLJ 177 a, (1977) 4 SCC 420. Bench – S M Ali and A Gupta. Introduction – The appellants were attempted under the watchful eye of the Court of the Second Additional Sessions Judge,
Author: Pranjali Pandya EQUIVALENT CITATION AIR 1963 SC 1094 BENCH JUSTICE K. SUBBARAO RELEVANT PROVISION INVOLVED SECTION 378 AND SECTION 379 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860. INTRODUCTION Theft refers to taking away property of any individual without their consent; the same is a penal offence under Section 378 of the Code and punishment lies
Author: Divya Bargava EQUIVALENT CITATION AIR 2001 S.C.C 3 BENCH Larner C.J , Justice Noble , La Forest , Gonthier , Cory , McLachlin , Iacobucci , Major J.J , L’Heureux –Dube , Sophinka . INTRODUCTION R v Latimer was a case which was held by the Supreme court of Canada. The full name of
