Vishaka & Others vs State of Rajasthan Bench of Judges CJI, SUJATA V. MANIHAR, B.N.KIRPAL Case brief This case is related to the evil of sexual harassment of women at working place. This case is the landmark case in the history of the sexual harassment that is decided by the Supreme Court. Sexual harassment means
CITATION- AIR 1994 SC 1918 DECIDED ON- 11.03.1994 BENCH- S.R. Pandian, A.M. Ahmadi, Kuldip Singh, J.S. Verma, P.B. Sawant, K. Ramaswamy, S.C. Agrawal, Yogeshwar Dayal and B.P. Jeevan Reddy, JJ. CASE INTRODUCTION-This case is considered to be a landmark judgement in the history of India. Till the judgement of the case As per the provision of Article 356
The Karnataka High Court asked the state government to immediately consider allowing conduct of online classes for primary school students, till a committee submits a report on the issue. The Court made the suggestion while dealing with the batch of petitions challenging the move to ban online classes for students from class LKG to class
The Delhi High Court has notified “Samadhan On-Line Mediation Project” at its Mediation & Conciliation Centre in an attempt to hold virtual sessions for dispute resolution amid COVID-19 pandemic. At present, the total pendency at the Centre is 846 which includes 670 Court Referred Mediation Matters and 172 Pre-Litigation Matter. 4 are Pre-Institution Mediation matters.
Citation : W. P. (Crl.) No. 76 of 2016 Bench Dipak Misra, CJI; Rohinton Fali Nariman, J.; A. M. Khanwilkar, J; D. Y. Chandrachud, and Indu Malhotra, J Facts The central issue of the case was the constitutional validity of section 377 of IPC, 1860 insofar because it applied to the consensual sexual conduct of adults of an equivalent sex privately. During
Citation : 1985 AIR 945, 1985 SCR (3) 844 Bench: Y.V. Chandrachud, D.A Desai, O Reddy, Venkataramiah Chinnappa, Rangnath Misra Facts – The appellant married to the respondent in 1932 and five children were born out of the wedlock. The appellant drove the respondent out of matrimonial home in 1975. In April 1978, the respondent
Author :- Ayesha Majid INTRODUCTION The unprecedented Covid- 19 has created new challenges and new situations in every field and the law and legal practice is no different. It has led to many changing dimensions ranging from the virtual meeting apps, remote hearing, closing of courts to electronic filing, restricting hearing to only urgent matters
The High Court of Telangana has issued a notice to Government and GHMC in a petition seeking directions to stop alleged ‘illegal transportation of camels from Rajasthan to Telangana’ for slaughtering. Chief Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan and Justice Vijayasen Reddy directed the greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) to ensure that no camel slaughtered in the
E-justice India cordially invite you to the webinar on “Loopholes in Criminal Law and Need of Men’s Commission“ Speaker – Dr. A P SinghSenior Advocate, Supreme Court of IndiaDefense Lawyer of Nirbhaya Case Date: July 06, 2020 Timing: 11:30 AM to 01:00 PM Click Here to Register After registering, First 200 registered Candidates will receive a confirmation email
CITATION- AIR 2005 SC 3820 BENCH- P. Venkatarama Reddi, P.P. Naolekar, JJ. FACTS- On 13 December 2001, five heavily armed persons entered the premises of Parliament House complex for carrying a very deadly attack. They were on a white Ambassador car and had automatic assault rifles, pistols, hand & rifle grenades, electronic detonators, explosives in
