Author – Megha Garg Equivalent citations: 1975 AIR 246, 1975 SCR (1) 561 Bench Khanna, Hans Raj Introduction This is an appeal case in which the appellants murdered two people. Section 302 the Murder Punishment, that, anyone who kills another person shall be sentenced with death, or [capital punishment], and shall also be liable for
Author: Megha Garg Equivalent citations: 1962 AIR 605, 1962 SCR Supl. (1) 567 Bench Subbarao, K Introduction K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra, a landmark case in India’s criminal history, has been a topic debated as ever since. This decision took its place the moment it was pronounced. This case was the last case to
Author: Shraddha Jindal EQUIVALENT CITATIONS: (1888) ILR 12 Bom 377 BENCH: Mr. Justice Birdwood Mr. Justice Parsons INTRODUCTION: The present case of “Bhawoo Jivaji vs Mulji Dayal” explains that what comes under the ambit of “wrongful restraint and confinement” and why a public servant who is on duty cannot be held liable for it. Section
Author: Mayank raj Case: Kedar Nath Singh vs. State of Bihar. Citation: 1962 AIR 955, 1962 SCR Sulp. (2) 769. Bench: Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sinha (C.J.), A.K. Sarkar, J.R. Madholkar, N.Rajagopala Ayyangar, S.K.Das. Introduction– Thomas Babington Macaulay who drafted the sedition law and was added in the Indian Penal code in 1870, section 124A which says
Case Name: Central Bank Of India Ltd vs. Ram Narain Author: Sameer M EQUIVALENT CITATIONS: 1955 AIR 36,1955 SCR(1)697 BENCH: Mr.Justice Mahajan Mehar Chand(CJ), Mukherjea, B.K Bose, Vivian, Jagannadhadas, B.Aiyyar, T.L. Venkatarama. INTRODUCTION: In Indian Penal Code, 1860 their was a provision to which punish Indian citizens who commits crime outside India. Under Section 4
Author : J. Shuruthi Case Name : B.K. Narayana Pillai Vs. Parameswaran Pillai A) CITATION: (2000) 1 SCC 712 B) BENCH: Justice S.P.Kurdukara Justice R.P.Sethi C) INTRODUCTION: The case explains about the amendment of written statements as under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code. The defendant has the right to take amendments
Author: Mayank Raj Case Name: Gyarsibai w/o Jagannath Vs. The State Citation: 1953 CriLJ 588 Bench: Dixit and Chatuarvedi Introduction: In the case, Gyarsibai vs. The State, the appellant were preceded before of the session decide of Shajapur of an offence under the Section 302 IPC for the murder of herself and 3 children and
Author: Divya Bhargava Case Name: R Vs. Brown Equivalent Citation [1993] 2 All ER 75 Bench Lord Templeman, Lord Jauncey , Lord Lowry , Lord Mustill and Lord Slynn Introduction The issue of consent plays a very important role when charging of defendants in the sexual offence. or charging someone with section 47 of the
Case Name : State of Maharashtra Vs. Mohd. Yakub and Others Author : Shraddha Jindal Equivalent Citation: 1980 AIR 1111 1980 SCR (2)1158 1980 SCC (3) 57 Bench: Justice R. S. SarkariaJustice Ranjit Singh preprationJustice Chinnappa Reddy Introduction: In the present case of ” state of Maharashtra vs. Mohammed Yakub and others” a clear distinction
Author : Aditi Gupta CASE NAME : RAM BHAJAN DAS VS. UNION OF INDIA, 2018 CITATION Decided on 28/11/2018 Writ petition (C) 52 of 2016 BENCH Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta INTRODUCTION Under article 142 Supreme Court in the order of its jurisdiction may pass orders necessary for doing justice
