Author : ARTHI M CITATION 2018 SC CIVIL APPEAL NO 3227 OF 2006 BENCH HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A BHUSHAN, A SIKRI INTRODUCTION The present case of Theiry Santhanamal Vs Viswanathan & Ors. deals with the matter of suit property and there other properties. FACTS Since the said property belonged to Mr. Mariasusai Mudaliar who was the
CASE NAME : Regina v. Dudley and Stephens AUTHOR : Suchandra Mukherjee EQUIVALENT CITATION 14 Q.B.D. 273 BENCH Chief Justice Lord Coleridge INTRODUCTION Necessity as a defense is defined under section 81 in Indian Penal Code As per section 81 when a act is done to harm but which doesn’t have the parameter of criminal
Case Name : Sakal Papers Ltd. v. Union of India Author : Srishti Facts of the case A private newspaper company published newspapers, filed petitions against the state challenging the newsprint policy of the government which restricted the number of pages a newspaper was entitled to print. The publishing company challenged the constitutional validity of
Author : Sandeep Rana Case Name : Epru Sudhakar v Govt of A.P. 2006 EQUIVALENT CITATIONS : (2006) 8 SCC 161 BENCH: INTRODUCTION The process of granting pardon in India starts with filing a mercy petition to the president under article 72 of the constitution. Firstly, this petition is discussed by the home ministry in consultation
Author : Sandeep Rana Case Name : Maru Ram v Union of India 1980 EQUIVALENT CITATIONS 1980 AIR 2147, 1981 SCR (1)1196 BENCH: HON’BLE JUSTICE Y. V. CHANDRACHUD (CJI) HON’BLE JUSTICE V. R. KRISHNA IYER HON’BLE JUSTICE P. N. BHAGWATI HON’BLE JUSTICE SYED M. FAZAL ALI HON’BLE JUSTICE A. D. KOSHAL INTRODUCTION Article 161 is
Author : Sheetal Maggon CITATION IV (2006) SLT 440 BENCH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. SRIKRISHNA AND HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA COURT HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATE OF JUDGMENT APRIL 27, 2006 INTRODUCTION This case was heard before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Aggrieved by the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of
Citation AIR 2000 SC 2773. Bench M B Shah and S.N. Phukan. Introduction The introduction start with question is that the questions involved in this appeal are that in a nation having various religions and various networks or groups, regardless of whether a specific network or organization of that network can guarantee option to include
AUTHOR : SYEDA KHIZRA RIZVI EQUIVALENT CITATION 1992 AIR 1858, 1992 SCR (3) 658 BENCH Kuldip Singh (J) PETITIONER MISS MOHINI JAIN RESPONDENT STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT 30/07/1992 FACTS A notification was raised by the Government of Karnataka under Section 5(1) of the Karnataka Educational Institution (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act,
Author : Sandeep Rana Case Name : Kehar Singh vs. Union of India 1989 EQUIVALENT CITATIONS 1989 AIR 653, 1988 SCR Supl. (3) 1102 BENCH · PATHAK, R.S. (CJ) · VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J) · MISRA RANGNATH · VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (J) · OJHA, N.D. (J) INTRODUCTION In India, the President and the Governor of states
